Combined effect of pantoprazole and mesenchymal stem cells on experimentally induced gastric ulcer: implication of oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis pathways.

Gastric ulcer (GU) is one of the most common diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract that affects millions of people worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the possible alleviating effect of a combined treatment of pantoprazole (PANTO) and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) in comparison with each treatment alone on the healing process of the experimentally induced GU in rats, and to uncover the involved pathways. Rats were divided into five groups: (1) Control, (2) GU, (3) PANTO, (4) ADSCs and (5) ADSCs + PANTO. Markers of oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis were assessed. The current data indicated that PANTO-, ADSCs- and ADSCs + PANTO-treated groups showed significant drop (p < 0.05) in serum advanced oxidation protein products (AOPPs) and advanced glycation end products (AGEPs) along with significant elevation (p < 0.05) in serum TAC versus the untreated GU group. Moreover, the treated groups (PANTO, ADSCs and ADSCs + PANTO) displayed significant down-regulation (p < 0.05) in gastric nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) and caspase-3 along with significant up-regulation (p < 0.05) in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) genes expression compared to the untreated GU group. Immunohistochemical examination of gastric tissue for transforming growth factor ß1 (TGF-ß1), epidermal growth factor (EGF) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) showed moderate to mild and weak immune reactions, respectively in the PANTO-, ADSCs- and ADSCs + PANTO-treated rat. Histopathological investigation of gastric tissue revealed moderate to slight histopathological alterations and almost normal histological features of the epithelial cells, gastric mucosal layer, muscularis mucosa and submucosa in PANTO-, ADSCs- and ADSCs + PANTO-treated rats, respectively. Conclusively, the co-treatment with ADSCs and PANTO evidenced sententious physiological protection against GU by suppressing oxidative stress, inhibiting inflammation and reducing apoptosis with consequent acceleration of gastric tissue healing process.

Repurposing of US-FDA-approved drugs as negative modulators of ubiquitin specific protease-7 (USP7).

Ubiquitin-specific protease7 (USP7) regulates the stability of the p53 tumor suppressor protein and several other proteins critical for tumor cell survival. Aberrant expression of USP7 facilitates human malignancies by altering the activity of proto-oncogenes/proteins, and tumor suppressor genes. Therefore, USP7 is a validated anti-cancer drug target. In this study, a drug repurposing approach was used to identify new hits against the USP7 enzyme. It is one of the most strategic approaches to find new uses for drugs in a cost- and time-effective way. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance-based screening of 172 drugs identified 11 compounds that bind to the catalytic domain of USP7 with dissociation constant (Kd) values in the range of 0.6-1.49 mM. These 11 compounds could thermally destabilize the USP7 enzyme by decreasing its melting temperature up to 9 °C. Molecular docking and simulation studies provided structural insights into the ligand-protein complexes, suggesting that these compounds bind to the putative substrate binding pocket of USP7, and interact with its catalytically important residues. Among the identified 11 hits, compound 6 (oxybutynin), 7 (ketotifen), 10 (pantoprazole sodium), and 11 (escitalopram) also showed anti-cancer activity with an effect on the expression of proto-oncogenes and tumor-suppressor gene at mRNA level in HCT116 cells. The compounds identified in this study can serve as potential leads for further studies.

Redirecting pantoprazole as a metallo-beta-lactamase inhibitor in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

The development of resistance to carbapenems in Klebsiella pneumoniae due to the production of metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs) is a critical public health problem because carbapenems are the last-resort drugs used for treating severe infections of extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBLs) producing K. pneumoniae. Restoring the activity of carbapenems by the inhibition of metallo-ß-lactamases is a valuable approach to combat carbapenem resistance. In this study, two well-characterized clinical multidrug and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were used. The sub-inhibitory concentrations of pantoprazole and the well-reported metallo-ß-lactamase inhibitor captopril inhibited the hydrolytic activities of metallo-ß-lactamases, with pantoprazole having more inhibiting activities. Both drugs, when used in combination with meropenem, exhibited synergistic activities. Pantoprazole could also downregulate the expression of the metallo-ß-lactamase genes bla NDM and bla VIM. A docking study revealed that pantoprazole could bind to and chelate zinc ions of New Delhi and Verona integron-encoded MBL (VIM) enzymes with higher affinity than the control drug captopril and with comparable affinity to the natural ligand meropenem, indicating the significant inhibitory activity of pantoprazole against metallo-ß-lactamases. In conclusion, pantoprazole can be used in combination with meropenem as a new strategy for treating serious infections caused by metallo-ß-lactamases producing K. pneumoniae.

Long-Term Use of Proton-Pump Inhibitors: Unravelling the Safety Puzzle.

Globally, over 25% of the population suffers from acid-related disorders such as dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and around 7.6% of Indians report having GERD symptoms on a frequent enough basis to warrant a diagnosis. Over the past three decades, proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the mainstay of medical therapy for acid-peptic diseases like GERD, etc. Additionally, they are frequently prescribed for prophylactic purposes and in conjunction with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. PPIs are generally prescribed for four to eight weeks. However, it may be prescribed for patients with comorbidities and multiple medications for a longer period of time. While this remains true in terms of effectiveness, concerns have been raised about the safety of long-term PPI use and the serious adverse effects that may result. Some of the observational and population-based cohort studies have shown an association between long-term use of PPIs and an increased risk of pneumonia, major cardiovascular events, dementia, vitamin B12 deficiency, bone fractures, gastric cancer, and kidney injury, among others. This review analyzes the clinical data supporting the long-term use of PPIs and takes a deep dive into whether these several emerging long-term concerns apply to the currently available PPIs in India. We have summarized a vast array of studies, including randomized trials, cohort studies, and meta-analyses, that report low or high incidences of major health risks linked with PPIs and have assessed their appropriateness over a given period.

In vitro interactions of proton pump inhibitors and azoles against pathogenic fungi.

Introduction: Azole resistance has been increasingly reported and become an issue for clinical managements of invasive mycoses. New strategy with combination therapy arises as a valuable and promising alternative option. The aim of the present study is to investigate the in vitro combinational effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and azoles against pathogenic fungi. Methods: In vitro interactions of PPIs including omeprazole (OME), lansoprazole (LAN), pantoprazole (PAN), and rabeprazole (RAB), and commonly used azoles including itraconazole (ITC), posaconazole (POS), voriconazole (VRC) and fluconazole (FLC), were investigated via broth microdilution chequerboard procedure adapted from the CLSI M27-A3 and M38-A2. A total of 67 clinically isolated strains, namely 27 strains of Aspergillus spp., 16 strains of Candida spp., and 24 strains of dematiaceous fungi, were studied. C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) and A. flavus (ATCC 204304) was included to ensure quality control. Results: PPIs individually did not exert any significant antifungal activity. The combination of OME with ITC, POS, or VRC showed synergism against 77.6%, 86.6%, and 4% strains of tested pathogenic fungi, respectively, while synergism of OME/FLC was observed in 50% strains of Candida spp. Synergism between PAN and ITC, POS, or VRC was observed against 47.8%, 77.6% and 1.5% strains of tested fungi, respectively, while synergism of PNA/FLC was observed in 50% strains of Candida spp. Synergism of LAN with ITC, POS, or VRC was observed against 86.6%, 86.6%, and 3% of tested strains, respectively, while synergism of LAN/FLC was observed in 31.3% strains of Candida spp. Synergy of the combination of RAB with ITC, POS, or VRC was observed against 25.4%, 64.2%, and 4.5% of tested strains, respectively, while synergism of RAB/FLC was observed in 12.5% of Candida spp.. Among PPIs, synergism was least observed between RAB and triazoles, while among triazoles, synergism was least observed between VRC and PPIs. Among species, synergy was much more frequently observed in Aspergillus spp. and dematiaceous fungi as compared to Candida spp. Antagonism between PPIs with ITC or VRC was occasionally observed in Aspergillus spp. and dematiaceous fungi. It is notable that PPIs combined with azoles showed synergy against azole resistant A. fumigatus, and resulted in category change of susceptibility of ITC and POS against Candida spp. Discussion: The results suggested that PPIs combined with azoles has the potential to enhance the susceptibilities of azoles against multiple pathogenic fungi and could be a promising strategy to overcome azole resistance issues. However, further investigations are warranted to study the combinational efficacy in more isolates and more species, to investigate the underlying mechanism of interaction and to evaluate the potential for concomitant use of these agents in human.

Efficacy and safety of pantoprazole and itopride in patients with overlap of gastroesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia: A prospective, open-label, single-arm pilot study.

Background and Aim: Combining proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with prokinetics can provide synergistic action in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and overlapping dyspepsia, but data regarding this is lacking. Methods: This single-center, prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 6-week treatment with fixed-drug combination (FDC) of pantoprazole (PPI) and itopride (prokinetic) in 50 patients with ≥3 month history of GERD and overlapping dyspepsia refractory to pantoprazole. Efficacy was assessed as reduction in GERD symptom assessment scale (GSAS) distress score for 15 symptoms from baseline to week 6. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored up to week 6. Results: Although heartburn was the most common symptom at week 6 (26.8%), its frequency significantly decreased from baseline (84.0%; P <0.01). A similar trend was observed for other symptoms: pressure/discomfort inside chest (19.5%), belching (14.6%), regurgitation (12.2%), bloating (9.8%), flatulence (9.8%), early satiety (7.3%), acidic/sour taste in mouth (7.3%), nausea (7.3%), frequent gurgling in stomach/belly (4.9%), and pressure/lump in throat (2.4%). Mean distress scores of all symptoms markedly decreased at week 6. Three AEs (n = 2) of moderate intensity were reported. Conclusion: The FDC of pantoprazole and itopride showed favorable efficacy and safety in patients with GERD and overlapping dyspepsia refractory to pantoprazole monotherapy. Nevertheless, further studies are warranted.

Proton-pump inhibitor-induced bone loss is preventable by concomitant use of a long-acting somatostatin analogue.

Objectives: Long-term consumption of pump inhibitors causes osteoporosis. Some possible mechanisms are gastrin over-secretion and hypochlorhydria. Octreotide is a somatostatin analog that inhibits the secretion of many hormones such as gastrin. This study aimed to assess the effects of pantoprazole on the bone when used with octreotide in an animal model. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight male Wistar rats were randomly assigned into 4 groups: A) pantoprazole 3 mg/Kg/day orally; B) Sandostatin LAR 1 mg/month intramuscular injection; C) Pantoprazole and Sandostatin LAR; and D) Control group. After 90 days of the experiment, bone densitometry was done and serum and urine samples were collected for analysis. Results: The results indicated a significant decrease in the global, spine, femur, and tibia bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) in the pantoprazole group compared to the control group (P<0.05). There was a significant increase in the levels of PTH, gastrin, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in the pantoprazole group compared to the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the serum levels of gastrin, PTH, ALP, and also BMD in the rats that received sandostatin+ pantoprazole or sandostatin alone, compared to the control group. Conclusion: This study showed that the pantoprazole-induced bone loss, through elevation of serum gastrin and PTH, was preventable by concomitant use of a long-acting somatostatin analog.

Safety of Intravenous Pantoprazole Sodium in Pediatric Patients Aged 1 Month to < 1 Year: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence rates (IR) of prespecified outcomes of interest in pediatric patients (1 month to < 1 year) treated with intravenous (IV) pantoprazole using Optum's longitudinal electronic health records database (Optum Market Clarity) from the United States (US). METHODS: This real-world, non-interventional, retrospective cohort study was conducted from 01 January 2007 to 31 December 2020 in patients who received IV pantoprazole. Premature patients and those weighing < 2.36 kg were excluded. Patients were categorized based on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and erosive esophagitis (EE) into: Subgroup 1 (GERD and EE), Subgroup 2 (GERD and no EE), and Subgroup 3 (absence of GERD and EE). Overall IRs (per 1000 person-years [PY]) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of outcomes were estimated (overall and subgroups) and stratified by duration of IV pantoprazole treatment (< 4 days versus ≥ 4 days). RESULTS: Of 1879 eligible patients, none were identified in Subgroup 1; 851 (45.3%) and 1028 (54.7%) patients were identified in Subgroups 2 and 3, respectively. IRs of outcomes of interest ranged from 0.0 to 742.8 per 1000 PY. IRs were highest for vomiting (742.80), diarrhea (377.77), abdominal distension (214.31), hyponatremia (204.99), and hypokalemia (203.49). IRs were comparable between Subgroups 2 and 3. For most outcomes, IRs were higher among patients treated with IV pantoprazole for ≥ 4 days versus those treated for < 4 days. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with the known safety profile of pantoprazole and emphasize the utility of using real-world data from pediatric populations for assessment of safety outcomes.

PBPK modeling to predict the pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in different CYP2C19 genotypes.

Pantoprazole is used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), maintain healing of erosive esophagitis (EE), and control symptoms related to Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). Pantoprazole is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19, converting to 4'-demethyl pantoprazole. CYP2C19 is a genetically polymorphic enzyme, and the genetic polymorphism affects the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of pantoprazole. In this study, we aimed to establish the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in populations with various CYP2C19 metabolic activities. A comprehensive investigation of previous reports and drug databases was conducted to collect the clinical pharmacogenomic data, physicochemical data, and disposition properties of pantoprazole, and the collected data were used for model establishment. The model was evaluated by comparing the predicted plasma concentration-time profiles and/or pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC and Cmax) with the clinical observation results. The predicted plasma concentration-time profiles in different CYP2C19 phenotypes properly captured the observed profiles. All fold error values for AUC and Cmax were included in the two-fold range. Consequently, the minimal PBPK model for pantoprazole related to CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism was properly established and it can predict the pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in different CYP2C19 phenotypes. The present model can broaden the insight into the individualized pharmacotherapy for pantoprazole.

Repurposing pantoprazole in combination with systemic therapy in advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a phase I/II randomized study.

Pantoprazole decreases the acidity of the tumor microenvironment by inhibiting proton pumps on the cancer cell. This possibly leads to increased sensitivity to cytotoxic therapy. We conducted a phase I/II randomized controlled trial in adult patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) planned for first-line palliative chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to chemotherapy + / - intravenous (IV) pantoprazole. The primary endpoint in phase I was to determine the maximum safe dose of intravenous pantoprazole, whereas it was progression-free survival (PFS) in phase II. The dose of IV pantoprazole established in phase I was 240 mg. Between Nov'18 and Oct'20, we recruited 120 patients in phase II, 59 on pantoprazole and 61 on the standard arm. Median age was 51 years (IQR 43-60), 80% were men. Systemic therapy was IV cisplatin in 22% and oral-metronomic-chemotherapy (OMC) in 78%. Addition of pantoprazole did not prolong PFS, which was 2.2 months (95% CI 2.07-3.19) in the pantoprazole arm and 2.5 months (95% CI 2.04-3.81, HR, 1.14; 95% CI 0.78-1.66; P = 0.48) in the standard arm. Response rates were similar; pantoprazole arm 8.5%, standard arm 6.6%; P = 0.175. Overall survival was also similar; 5.6 months (95% CI 4.47-8.51) in the pantoprazole arm and 5.4 months (95% CI 3.48-8.54, HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.72-1.57; P = 0.75) in the standard arm. Grade ≥ 3 toxicities were similar. Thus, pantoprazole 240 mg IV added to systemic therapy does not improve outcomes in patients with advanced HNSCC.

Evaluation of gastroprotectant administration in hospitalized cats in a tertiary referral hospital.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the prescription patterns and appropriateness of the use of gastroprotectant medication in cats. METHODS: Pharmacy dispensation logs from an academic tertiary referral center were reviewed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018. Cats that were administered proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), sucralfate, misoprostol, antacids or a combination were included. Data regarding medication, dosage, formulation, duration of administration, completeness of discharge instructions and clinical rationales for administration were obtained from medical records. The appropriateness of gastroprotectant use was assessed according to the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus statement guidelines. RESULTS: Of the 110 cases, 67 (60.9%) were prescribed a gastroprotectant medication without an appropriate indication. The most common reason for prescription was acute kidney injury in 26/67 (38.8%). PPIs were the most common gastroprotectant medication administered in 95/110 (86.3%) cats, followed by sucralfate in 18/110 (16.4%) and H2RAs in 11/110 (10%). Of the 35 cases in which gastroprotectant therapy was indicated, the medication chosen or dosage administered was considered suboptimal in 16 (45.7%). Instructions regarding the duration of administration, potential adverse effects and timing of administration in relation to meals or other medications were inconsistently provided in discharge instructions to pet owners. Of the 29 cases discharged with omeprazole, only 13 (44.8%) instructions included a duration of administration, while 6 (20.7%) recommended continuing gastroprotectants indefinitely until further notice, 16 (55.2%) discussed the timing of the administration in relation to a meal and six (20.7%) mentioned potential adverse effects; none advised tapering of omeprazole before discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: When prescribed, gastroprotectant medications were frequently prescribed injudiciously to cats in this referral population over a 12-month period. Discharge instructions to pet owners also often lacked information and recommendations regarding optimal administration, potential adverse effects, and tapering or discontinuation of the medications.

Investigating Skin Rashes Associated With Pantoprazole Medication: Causes and Clinical Implications.

Pantoprazole is a proton-pump inhibitor mainly used in treating various gastroesophageal disorders and frequently as prophylaxis for stress ulcers and gastrointestinal bleeding in most patients admitted for in-hospital management. Hypersensitivity reactions to this medication have been reported, although the exact incidence and prevalence are unknown. Further studies on proton-pump inhibitor allergic reactions should be conducted to enable physicians to safely select and prescribe an alternative type of medication within the same drug class, confidently avoiding the allergenic molecular compound that the patient reacted to previously. We present a case of a 35-year-old male postoperative bariatric patient with no significant allergy history who developed an allergic skin rash a week after being discharged on pantoprazole 40 mg. His rash was itchy and distributed mainly over the torso and lower limbs, without any additional respiratory or gastrointestinal symptoms.

Anaphylaxis Caused by Taking Pantoprazole: Case Series.

Introduction: Pantoprazole is one of the most widely used proton pump inhibitors, but anaphylaxis occurs rarely during its use. The purpose of reporting these two cases is to show that pantoprazole is not a drug without problems; it can also cause anaphylactic reactions. Cases description: A 42-year-old woman presented to the emergency department due to dyspeptic complaints. Immediately at the end of the infusion of pantoprazole, there started to be numbness of the tongue, itching all over the body, and difficulty in breathing. Half an hour after taking a pantoprazole 40 mg capsule, a 58-year-old woman started to experience redness of the face, thickening of the tongue, itching, bloating, and dizziness. Arterial pressure was 80/60 mmHg, pulse 150/minute, while saturation had dropped to 88%. In both cases, fluids, adrenaline, antihistamines, methylprednisolone, and calcium were immediately started. After the improvement of their general conditions, both patients were discharged home. Discussion: The first case relates to anaphylaxis after the intravenous administration of pantoprazole, and the second case relates to the appearance of anaphylaxis after its oral administration. Conclusion: Health workers need to be informed about the possibility of anaphylaxis in patients taking both oral and parenteral pantoprazole. LEARNING POINTS: PPIs are generally safe, with a low percentage of side effects of 1-3%.Although hypersensitive reactions to PPIs are rare, cases of anaphylactoid reactions have also been reported in the literature.Anaphylaxis caused by taking pantoprazole should be considered in the differential diagnosis of anaphylaxis in both oral and parenteral administration of the drug.Doctors and pharmacists should be very careful when prescribing pantoprazole and other PPIs, especially to the elderly.

14-Day Vonoprazan-Based Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for Treatment-Naïve Patients with Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Background: Until now, there is little evidence regarding clinical efficacy of 14-day vonoprazan-based bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. Methods: Overall, 65 treatment-naïve patients with H. pylori infection who received 14-day vonoprazan-based BQT regimen (VBCA, n=17) or pantoprazole-based BQT regimen (PBCA, n=48) for H. pylori eradication were retrospectively included. Results: Neither successful H. pylori eradication (88.2% versus 91.7%, p=1.000) nor adverse event (52.9% versus 64.6%, p=0.397) was significantly different between VBCA and PBCA groups. Conclusion: Vonoprazan seems to be as effective and safe as pantoprazole during a 14-day BQT regimen in treatment-naïve patients with H. pylori infection.

Tachycardia and fever after packed red cell (PRC) infusion: A case report.

A 56-year-old female patient with a body weight of 60 kg was brought to the hospital with hematemesis and received one unit of packed red cells (PRCs) for this condition. After 30 min, the patient experienced tachycardia of 120 beats/min and an increased body temperature of 102°F. The patient had no relevant medical history of allergy or similar episodes in the past. The patient was not suffering from any coagulopathies or sickle cell anaemia, which is a prevalent condition in the region. The patient was receiving the PRC for the first time. After this event, the infusion was stopped and immediately injection meropenem, pantoprazole and ondansetron IV were administered. The patient's condition normalised after 6 h. No re-challenge was given after the recovery of the patient. Suspected ADR was analysed according to the World Health organization (WHO) causality assessment scale and the causality was "Possible". Meticulous monitoring and prompt therapy were provided. The patient was discharged after observing for 24 h. The adverse drug reaction was possibly caused due to the PRCs.

A retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes between hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who received famotidine or pantoprazole.

Background and Aim: There is limited research on the use of histamine-H2 receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors for treating COVID-19. We compare clinical outcomes between patients hospitalized with COVID-19 receiving famotidine or pantoprazole. Methods: This retrospective study included 2184 patients (famotidine: n = 638, pantoprazole: n = 727, nonuse: n = 819) aged 18 years or older treated for COVID-19 from March 2020 to March 2021. Patients who received both famotidine and pantoprazole treatments were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression was used for the primary outcome, namely all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes, namely mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, acute kidney injury, and gastrointestinal bleeding. The main predictor variable was the use of famotidine or pantoprazole. Covariates were demographics, chronic diseases, and symptoms. Results: As compared to nonuse, famotidine (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.20-0.44, P < 0.001) and pantoprazole (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.33-0.66, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with lower odds for all-cause mortality. Comparison of famotidine and pantoprazole showed that the former had lower odds for all-cause mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% CI:0.45-0.95, P < 0.05), mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.25-0.58, P < 0.001), vasopressor use (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.22-0.48, P < 0.001), acute kidney injury (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.30-0.54, P < 0.001), and gastrointestinal bleeding (OR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.08, 0.29, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Famotidine is associated with lower odds for all-cause mortality, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, acute kidney injury, and gastrointestinal bleeding as compared to pantoprazole in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. We recommend that clinicians consider the use of famotidine over pantoprazole for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Future research with a clinical trial would be beneficial to further support such use of famotidine.

Proton pump inhibitors use prior to COVID-19 hospitalization is associated with higher Clostridioides difficile infection rate.

BACKGROUND: There are uncertainties regarding associations of prior proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use with susceptibility for COVID-19 and risks associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to evaluate the associations of prior PPI use with outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We have retrospectively evaluated a total of 5959 consecutively hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from a tertiary-level institution in the period 3/2020-6/2021. Associations of prior PPI use with outcomes of in-hospital mortality, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis, major bleeding, bacteremia, and Clostridioides difficile infection (C. diff.) were evaluated in entire and case-matched cohorts. RESULTS: Among 5959 evaluated patients, there were 1967 (33%) PPI users. In an entire cohort, prior PPI use was associated with higher in-hospital mortality and higher occurrence of C. diff. Association of prior PPI use with mortality diminished, whereas association with C. diff. persisted after multivariable adjustments. In a matched cohort, prior PPI use was associated only with higher risk of C. diff. but not other outcomes in line with multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although prior PPI use might not have a significant impact on clinical course and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 infection, it may predispose patients to the development of complications like higher occurrence of C. diff. and thus substantially impact the course of treatment.

Beyond the Usual: Pantoprazole-Induced Anaphylaxis During Peribulbar Anesthesia.

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most prescribed drugs in the world. Although they are remarkably safe, with minimal adverse effects, it has rarely been reported as a cause of anaphylaxis. Hence, we report the case of a 69-year-old patient who experienced intravenous pantoprazole-induced anaphylaxis during peribulbar block anesthesia for mechanical vitrectomy.

A Pharmacogenetics-Based Approach to Managing Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Current Perspectives and Future Steps.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used medications to treat acid-related conditions, including gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Gastroenterology guidelines mention the importance of CYP2C19 in PPI metabolism and the influence of CYP2C19 genetic variations on variable responses to PPIs, but do not currently recommend the genotyping of CYP2C19 prior to prescribing PPIs. There are strong data to support the influence of CYP2C19 genetic variations on the pharmacokinetics of PPIs and clinical outcomes. Existing pharmacogenetic guideline recommendations for dose increases focus on H. pylori and erosive esophagitis indications, but PPIs are also the main therapy for treating GERD. Recent data suggest GERD patients being treated with a PPI may also benefit from genotype-guided dosing. We summarize the literature supporting this contention and highlight future directions for improved management of patients with GERD through precision medicine approaches.